Data reports for every UK council

Mid Sussex shows a dynamic and diverse economic landscape. The total employment is robust at 54,582, with 124 companies reporting an increase in employees. The region’s industry is diversified, with significant activities in professional, scientific, technical, construction, and retail trade sectors. The absence of IPOs indicates a focus on established businesses rather than new public companies. The employee growth percentage of 7.54% is promising, showing an active and growing workforce. The presence of 63 scaleups signifies a healthy startup ecosystem. The region’s economic health is further underscored by the existence of 9,542 SMEs and 305 exporters, indicating a strong local and international business presence.

Mid Suffolk showcases a dynamic economic landscape, characterised by a diverse range of sectors. The region’s total employment stands at 33,969, with a notable 48 companies reporting growth in employment. The diversity in the business sector is reflected in the dominance of professional, scientific, and technical activities, along with significant contributions from construction, wholesale and retail trade, and other sectors.

East Suffolk’s economic landscape is diverse and dynamic, marked by significant activity in sectors such as professional, scientific, and technical activities, and construction. The area demonstrates a healthy mix of established companies and new, growing businesses, with a notable presence in innovative sectors. The gender distribution among founders and directors highlights a need for increased female representation in leadership roles.

East Staffordshire showcases a diverse and evolving economic landscape. The area employs a total of 77,172 individuals, with a notable presence in sectors such as professional, scientific, technical activities, and retail trade. The region has experienced a growth in employment, reflected in a 10.56% employee growth rate, and the emergence of 36 scale-ups indicates a dynamic business environment. However, the absence of IPOs suggests limited activities in public markets. The gender representation among founders and directors reveals a male predominance, highlighting potential areas for increased diversity.